i'm trying to set up header interpretation rules for MS exchange. But
i've got the problem that i can define regular expressions for the
value of the header but not for the name of the header itself.
In my test cases i always had
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-1: True
or
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-0: True
(same thing with the "Verified" header).
Are there any other numbering combinations (1-0, 0-2, ...) that can
occur for the *-Signer* header?
Regarding the headers for the encryption:
Is the existence a header with the name
X-Djigzo-Info-Encryption-Algorithm-0: and any value sufficient to
notify the user that the message was encrypted? And is it possible
that the name of the header contains any other numbers than 0?
This is more or less explained in Appendix A of the S/MIME support guide
but it boils down to this:
An S/MIME message can be encrypted and signed with multiple levels in
random order. For example a message can be signed, then encrypted and
then signed again. The numbering scheme shows for which level the
particular header is. So for example if a message is signed and then
encrypted (the most standard version) the
X-Djigzo-Info-Encryption-Algorithm-0 tells you with which encryption
algorithm the message was encrypted.
Because the message is 'peeled' from outer layer to inner layer, when a
message is signed and then encrypted, the outer layer is encrypted,
hence the -0 level.
To answer your question, if the header
X-Djigzo-Info-Encryption-Algorithm-0 is present, it means that the outer
layer was encrypted so that should be sufficient if that's the only
information you need.
Kind regards,
Martijn
···
On 02/25/2011 09:57 AM, Bernhard Heinzle wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to set up header interpretation rules for MS exchange. But
i've got the problem that i can define regular expressions for the
value of the header but not for the name of the header itself.
In my test cases i always had
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-1: True
or
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-0: True
(same thing with the "Verified" header).
Are there any other numbering combinations (1-0, 0-2, ...) that can
occur for the *-Signer* header?
Regarding the headers for the encryption:
Is the existence a header with the name
X-Djigzo-Info-Encryption-Algorithm-0: and any value sufficient to
notify the user that the message was encrypted? And is it possible
that the name of the header contains any other numbers than 0?
Yes other combination are possible but only is special cases. As
explained in the previous email, there can be multiple levels. In
addition to that a level can have multiple signers so in theory the
following *-Signer* headers are possible:
*-Signer*-N-N where N is a number >= 0.
In you case however I would only support
*-Signer*-0-N
And perhaps even only
*-Signer*-0-0 or,
*-Signer*-0-1
All other combinations are possible but almost impossible to explain to
end-users.
Kind regards,
Martijn
···
On 02/25/2011 09:57 AM, Bernhard Heinzle wrote:
i'm trying to set up header interpretation rules for MS exchange. But
i've got the problem that i can define regular expressions for the
value of the header but not for the name of the header itself.
In my test cases i always had
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-1: True
or
X-Djigzo-Info-Signer-Trusted-0-0: True
(same thing with the "Verified" header).
Are there any other numbering combinations (1-0, 0-2, ...) that can
occur for the *-Signer* header?